Severe Recurrent COVID-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis: A Challenging Case

We report a rare case of severe COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis presenting as invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and subsequently invasive tracheobronchial aspergillosis during hospitalization in a critically ill patient who developed a further Aspergillus infection after home discharge. He needed readmission to the ICU and mechanical ventilation. We therefore strongly encourage a high degree of attention to fungal complications, even after viral recovery and ICU discharge

Airway Closure during Surgical Pneumoperitoneum in Obese Patients

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: Airway closure has been described in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and cardiac arrest patientsThis phenomenon makes tidal inflation start only after a critical airway opening pressure is overcomeAlthough previously reported during general anesthesia, airway closure was partially misinterpreted WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: Airway closure affects a relevant proportion of obese patients undergoing general anesthesia in supine position, with a variable degree of airway opening pressureWith Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum, airway opening pressure increases consistently with esophageal pressure and pneumoperitoneum insufflation pressure: consequently, transalveolar pressure, lung volumes, and alveolar recruitment do not varyAirway closure yields bedside misinterpretation of respiratory mechanics and underestimation of actual alveolar pressure in the intraoperative settingIt is an occult phenomenon that generates an airway pressure threshold, whereby inspiratory gas does not inflate the lung unless the airway opening pressure is exceeded BACKGROUND:: Airway closure causes lack of communication between proximal airways and alveoli, making tidal inflation start only after a critical airway opening pressure is overcome. The authors conducted a matched cohort study to report the existence of this phenomenon among obese patients undergoing general anesthesia. METHODS: Within the procedures of a clinical trial during gynecological surgery, obese patients underwent respiratory/lung mechanics and lung volume assessment both before and after pneumoperitoneum, in the supine and Trendelenburg positions, respectively. Among patients included in this study, those exhibiting airway closure were compared to a control group of subjects enrolled in the same trial and matched in 1:1 ratio according to body mass index. RESULTS: Eleven of 50 patients (22%) showed airway closure after intubation, with a median (interquartile range) airway opening pressure of 9\u2009cm H2O (6 to 12). With pneumoperitoneum, airway opening pressure increased up to 21\u2009cm H2O (19 to 28) and end-expiratory lung volume remained unchanged (1,294\u2009ml [1,154 to 1,363] vs. 1,160\u2009ml [1,118 to 1,256], P = 0.155), because end-expiratory alveolar pressure increased consistently with airway opening pressure and counterbalanced pneumoperitoneum-induced increases in end-expiratory esophageal pressure (16\u2009cm H2O [15 to 19] vs. 27\u2009cm H2O [23 to 30], P = 0.005). Conversely, matched control subjects experienced a statistically significant greater reduction in end-expiratory lung volume due to pneumoperitoneum (1,113\u2009ml [1,040 to 1,577] vs. 1,000 ml [821 to 1,061], P = 0.006). With airway closure, static/dynamic mechanics failed to measure actual lung/respiratory mechanics. When patients with airway closure underwent pressure-controlled ventilation, no tidal volume was inflated until inspiratory pressure overcame airway opening pressure. CONCLUSIONS: In obese patients, complete airway closure is frequent during anesthesia and is worsened by Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum, which increases airway opening pressure and alveolar pressure: besides preventing alveolar derecruitment, this yields misinterpretation of respiratory mechanics and generates a pressure threshold to inflate the lung that can reach high values, spreading concerns on the safety of pressure-controlled modes in this setting

Goal-directed hemodynamic management in patients undergoing primary debulking gynaecological surgery: A matched-controlled precision medicine study

Background: Usefulness of intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic management (GDHM) for patients without comorbidities is debated. After clinical implementation of a pulse contour analysis-guided GDHM protocol, which foresees early vasopressor use for recruiting unstressed volume, we conducted a matched-controlled analysis to explore its impact on the amount of fluids intraoperatively administered to patients without comorbidities who underwent extended abdominal surgery for ovarian cancer. Methods: After 1:1 matching accounting for body mass index, oncologic disease severity and intraoperative blood losses, 22 patients treated according to this GDHM protocol were compared to a control group of 22 patients who had been managed according to the clinical decision of attending physicians, taken without advanced monitoring. Results are displayed as median[interquartile range]. Results: All analyzed patients underwent radical hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, bowel resection, peritonectomy and extended pelvic/periaortic lymphadenectomy; median length of surgery was 517[480\u2013605] min in patients receiving GDHM and 507[480\u2013600] min in control group. Intraoperatively, patients undergoing GDHM received less fluids (crystalloids 2950[2700\u20133300] vs. 5150[4700\u20136000] mL, p < 0.001; colloids 100[50\u2013200] vs. 750[500\u20131000] mL, p < 0.001) and showed a trend to more frequent vasopressor administration (32 vs 9%, p = 0.13). Greater intraoperative diuresis (540[480\u2013620] mL vs. 450[400\u2013500] mL, p = 0.007), lower blood lactates at surgery end (1.5[1.1\u20132] vs. 4.1[3.3\u20135] mmol/L, p < 0.001), shorter time to bowel function recovery (1 [1, 2] vs. 4 [3\u20135] days, p < 0.001) and hospital discharge (7 [6\u20138] vs 12 [9\u201316] days, p < 0.0001) were detected in patients receiving GDHM. Conclusions: In high-tumor load gynaecological patients without comorbidities who receive radical and prolonged surgery, intraoperative use of this novel GDHM protocol helped limit fluids administration with safety

High Failure Rate of Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategies in Critically Ill Subjects With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19

Background: The efficacy of noninvasive oxygenation strategies (NIOS) in treating COVID-19 disease is unknown. We conducted a prospective observational study to assess the rate of NIOS failure in subjects treated in the ICU for hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Methods: Patients receiving first-line treatment NIOS for hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 in the ICU of a university hospital were included in this study; laboratory data were collected upon arrival, and 28-d outcome was recorded. After propensity score matching based on Simplified Acute Physiology (SAPS) II score, age, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] at arrival, the NIOS failure rate in subjects with COVID-19 was compared to a previously published cohort who received NIOS during hypoxemic respiratory failure due to other causes. Results: A total of 85 subjects received first-line treatment with NIOS. The most frequently used methods were helmet noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula; of these, 52 subjects (61%) required endotracheal intubation. Independent factors associated with NIOS failure were SAPS II score (P = .009) and serum lactate dehydrogenase at enrollment (P = .02); the combination of SAPS II score 65 33 with serum lactate dehydrogenase 65 405 units/L at ICU admission had 91% specificity in predicting the need for endotracheal intubation. In the propensity-matched cohorts (54 pairs), subjects with COVID-19 showed higher risk of NIOS failure than those with other causes of hypoxemic respiratory failure (59% vs 35%, P = .02), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2 (95% CI 1.1-3.6, P = .01). Conclusions: As compared to hypoxemic respiratory failure due to other etiologies, subjects with COVID-19 who were treated with NIOS in the ICU were burdened by a 2-fold higher risk of failure. Subjects with a SAPS II score 65 33 and serum lactate dehydrogenase 65 405 units/L represent the population with the greatest risk

Respiratory physiology of COVID-19-induced respiratory failure compared to ARDS of other etiologies

Background: Whether respiratory physiology of COVID-19-induced respiratory failure is different from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of other etiologies is unclear. We conducted a single-center study to describe respiratory mechanics and response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in COVID-19 ARDS and to compare COVID-19 patients to matched-control subjects with ARDS from other causes. Methods: Thirty consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to an intensive care unit in Rome, Italy, and fulfilling moderate-to-severe ARDS criteria were enrolled within 24 h from endotracheal intubation. Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and ventilatory ratio were measured at PEEP of 15 and 5 cmH2O. A single-breath derecruitment maneuver was performed to assess recruitability. After 1:1 matching based on PaO2/FiO2, FiO2, PEEP, and tidal volume, COVID-19 patients were compared to subjects affected by ARDS of other etiologies who underwent the same procedures in a previous study. Results: Thirty COVID-19 patients were successfully matched with 30 ARDS from other etiologies. At low PEEP, median [25th-75th percentiles] PaO2/FiO2 in the two groups was 119 mmHg [101-142] and 116 mmHg [87-154]. Average compliance (41 ml/cmH2O [32-52] vs. 36 ml/cmH2O [27-42], p = 0.045) and ventilatory ratio (2.1 [1.7-2.3] vs. 1.6 [1.4-2.1], p = 0.032) were slightly higher in COVID-19 patients. Inter-individual variability (ratio of standard deviation to mean) of compliance was 36% in COVID-19 patients and 31% in other ARDS. In COVID-19 patients, PaO2/FiO2 was linearly correlated with respiratory system compliance (r = 0.52 p = 0.003). High PEEP improved PaO2/FiO2 in both cohorts, but more remarkably in COVID-19 patients (p = 0.005). Recruitability was not different between cohorts (p = 0.39) and was highly inter-individually variable (72% in COVID-19 patients and 64% in ARDS from other causes). In COVID-19 patients, recruitability was independent from oxygenation and respiratory mechanics changes due to PEEP. Conclusions: Early after establishment of mechanical ventilation, COVID-19 patients follow ARDS physiology, with compliance reduction related to the degree of hypoxemia, and inter-individually variable respiratory mechanics and recruitability. Physiological differences between ARDS from COVID-19 and other causes appear small

Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross sectional study

BACKGROUND: Breast and cervical cancer screening are widely recognized as effective preventive procedures in reducing cancer mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of female screening in Italy, with a specific focus on different types of screening programs. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the 2004-2005 national health interview survey. A sample of 15, 486 women aged 50-69 years for mammography and one of 35, 349 women aged 25-64 years for Pap smear were analysed. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between socioeconomic factors and female screening utilization. RESULTS: Education and occupation were positively associated with attendance to both screening. Women with higher levels of education were more likely to have a mammogram than those with a lower level (OR = 1.28; 95% CI = 1.10-1.49). Women of intermediate and high occupational classes were more likely to use breast cancer screening (OR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.55-2.03, OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.40-1.91) compared to unemployed women. Women in the highest occupational class had a higher likelihood of cervical cancer screening compared to those in the lowest class (OR = 1.81; 95% CI = 1.63-2.01). Among women who attended screening, those with lower levels of education and lower occupational classes were more likely than more advantaged women to attend organized screening programs rather than being screened on the basis of their own initiative. CONCLUSIONS: Inequalities in the uptake of female screening widely exist in Italy. Organized screening programs may have an important role in increasing screening attendance and tackling inequalities

Asthma in patients admitted to emergency department for COVID-19: prevalence and risk of hospitalization

Non